meaning of Anarki
Titles in the news media a few days ago saying, Kapolri: Pendemo Anarkis It followed earlier. Seeing the title, I began to be exercised. I ire because the words appear Anarkis now often in use for that sure brutal act of violence or by a group of people. The demonstration ended with ricuhpun mentioned anarki action. View of this phenomenon, the word "anarki" has been the mistaken dimaknai. Fallacious because it can only be duping the public, as efforts to reject, mendiskriditkan, cornered an ideology / understand (isme) that not all ideal, the ideal diusungnya like that.
Need to be made clear before, I'm not understand the anarki (anarchism), although there are some things in the mind-understand the thinking that gave little color ideal, my personal ideal. Especially the topic of discussion amongst the social dynamics.
If we examine the words of Etymology anarki, anarki word is a word of English serapan Anarchy or anarchie (Netherlands / Germany / France), which stems from the Greek word anarchos / anarchein. Next, the word is formed from "a" (no / no / naught / negasi) disisipi the "n" with archos / archein (government / power or the parties implement the control and authority - the koersif, repressive, including slavery and Portland) . Anarchos / anarchein = without government or the management and coordination with the relationship rule and governed, control and domination, and the head are, control and manageable, and others. Meanwhile Anarkis means that people trust and follow anarki. (wikipedia Indonesia)
Indeed, the travel history, the disciple understand anarki in various aksinya often use violence as a "method" to convey ideas, ideas. Even some say the violence is a step that is quite effective in protecting ideas. Furthermore, violence and the like should be done when faced with "capitalism" and "country" in the context of the system.
We know and understand the history to prove when (isme) capitalized collaborate with the country (to the system), can be seen very strong and it dominannya collaboration. Is not only capitalism, socialism, communism, or understand the lainpun allow that. Wal-result is very reasonable when you want to be dominated, and the anarki do it. Capitalist also been doing the same even harder, but how wrapped more "beautiful".
However, when we want to further examine the ideas and idealogi offered by anarki understand in the beginning, the idea did not touch at all with the action / action violence. Similar to understand some of the other. Attractive again, a thinker anarkis, Alexander Berkman, said,
"Anarchism is not a Bomb, irregularity or chaos. Not a robbery and murder. Also not a war between the slightly against all. Means not return kekehidupan barbarity, or conditions of the wild man. Anarchism is the reverse of all that. Anarchism means that you should be free. That no one can enslave you, you become an employer, rob you, or force you. That means that you should be free to do what you want, have the opportunity to choose the kind of life you want and live in it without them, have equality of rights, and live in peace and harmony as brothers. Means that there can not be war, violence, monopoly, poverty, oppression, and enjoy the opportunity to live together in equality. "(Alexander Berkman, What is Communist Anarchist 1870 - 1936)
Freedom is truly free and the substance of human existence idependen is the ideal diusung by anarchism. Even a Mikhail Bakunin (1814-1876), Anarki of the most revolutionary, nor promote the model of violence in the struggle understand anarki. Although Bakunin have a strong statement against the domination of the country with full kemunafikkan at the time. Up to the time-starters may still occur, when the country Authority to play a role to exploit even the components of other countries for personal or group -
Indeed, the model had diusung violence by a group of the anarki understand. But that's not quite fair when we make generalizations meaning, and even tend to mendiskriditkan, menciderai understanding of the meaning or place tonight. If I want to see from a negative mindset, if this is a systematic effort to understand the hold-understand the question by the credo anarki to continue the domination and hegemoninya. And according to my opinion this is a systematic effort to violence, killing and brutal "character" isme anarki. But who can say that here is identical with violence? (According ratupelissa media.com)
